Reference architecture

Cost and Reliability Engineering

A control system for optimizing cost per successful task while preserving quality, latency, safety, capacity, and fallback behavior.

18 minVerified 2026-07-214 primary sources
A governed production AI reference architecture with observable, secured service boundaries.

Architecture

A control system for optimizing cost per successful task while preserving quality, latency, safety, capacity, and fallback behavior.

Intent and policy
Validated request
Controlled execution
Independent verification
Telemetry and response
Conceptual teaching model synthesized from:Latency OptimizationSite Reliability EngineeringHorizontal Pod AutoscalingEvaluation Best Practices

The architecture separates intent, policy, state, execution, evidence, and response. Each boundary has one accountable owner and an observable contract. Probabilistic components may propose or classify; deterministic software owns permissions, budgets, state transitions, and release conditions.

Architecture claim
Representative test
Production signal
Decision gate
Review or rollback
Conceptual teaching model synthesized from:Latency OptimizationSite Reliability EngineeringHorizontal Pod AutoscalingEvaluation Best Practices

Decisions

| Decision | Required evidence | Review trigger | |---|---|---| | Optimize cost per accepted outcome rather than price per token. | Versioned test, trace, or architecture record | Material workload, provider, policy, or data change | | Budget quality, latency, reliability, and safety together. | Versioned test, trace, or architecture record | Material workload, provider, policy, or data change | | Route only when eligibility and fallback evidence are explicit. | Versioned test, trace, or architecture record | Material workload, provider, policy, or data change | | Use error budgets to decide when optimization experiments may proceed. | Versioned test, trace, or architecture record | Material workload, provider, policy, or data change |

Alternatives and trade-offs

A centralized control plane simplifies policy and evidence collection but can become a latency and availability dependency. Distributed enforcement reduces central bottlenecks but requires consistent identity, versions, and audit semantics. Prefer the smallest boundary that can enforce the invariant and prove the outcome.

Failure modes

  • Retries and human correction are excluded from cost.
  • Cheap models receive tasks they cannot complete reliably.
  • Caching hides stale or unauthorized outputs.
  • Autoscaling reacts after unbounded queues have formed.

Operational checklist

  • [ ] Unit economics include failures, retries, review, and platform cost.
  • [ ] Routing cohorts and escalation paths are evaluated.
  • [ ] Latency budgets reserve time for fallbacks.
  • [ ] Provider degradation and quota exhaustion are rehearsed.
  • [ ] Optimization changes have paired quality and reliability gates.

Connected practice

Sources

  • openai-latency
  • sre-book
  • kubernetes-hpa
  • openai-evals