Mental model
Regression monitoring compares versioned behavior on stable cohorts and production samples while controlling for changes in inputs and graders.
Learning outcomes
- Explain the mechanism and ownership boundaries behind Model and Prompt Regression Monitoring.
- Compare the main design alternatives and their operational trade-offs.
- Diagnose common failures and select evidence for a production decision.
Theory
Record the full configuration fingerprint, run pre-release paired evaluations, use canaries, segment metrics, preserve exemplars, and distinguish distribution drift from implementation change. Revalidate graders when models change.
Trade-offs
Broad evaluation suites catch more failures but cost time and labels. Small smoke sets are fast but miss long-tail regressions and can be overfit.
Failure modes and misconceptions
Unversioned prompts; comparing different traffic cohorts; silent grader changes; only average scores; no rollback threshold; and treating nondeterministic variance as a trend.
Decision scenario
A provider updates a model alias and answer style changes while task success appears stable. Decide what to compare before accepting the update.
Why must the evaluator version be included in a behavior regression record?
Primary sources
openai-evalsmlflow-model-registry